Assess the Quality of a Research Paper Studypool values your privacy. Only questions posted as Public are visible on our website.
The Higher Education Funding Council for England are reviewing the idea of using metrics or citation counts in research assessment.
The deadline for receiving responses is 12pm on Monday 30th June to metrics hefce. If you want to add an endorsement to this paper to be added to what we send to HEFCE, please write your name, role and institutional affiliation below in the comments, or email either ms[at]soas.
If you want to write your own response, please feel free to borrow as you like from the ideas below, or append the PDF version of our paper available here. Not only is there no logical connection between citation counts and the quality of academic research, but the adoption of such a system could systematically discriminate against less established scholars and against work by women and ethnic minorities.
Moreover, as we know, citation counts are highly vulnerable to gaming and manipulation.
This letter notes that some people may use metrics Assess quality research paper assess research, and that the Secretary of State wishes to look at the issue again. To speak more precisely, we might consider the following underlying rationales as driving this general interest: The research assessment exercises conducted at a national level RAE ; REF and at institutional levels are difficult, time-consuming, expensive and laborious because they consume large quantities of academic energy.
Universities and academics themselves have complained about this. Ministers, civil servants, research administrators and managers might prefer modes of assessment that do not require human academic input and judgement.
This would be cheaper, not require academic expertise and would be easier to administer. This would facilitate the exercise of greater administrative control over the distribution of research resources and inputs.
Moreover, in an age of often-digitised scholarship, numerical values associated with citations are being produced — mostly by data from large corporate journal publishers — and amongst some scholarly communities at some times they are considered a mark of prestige.
This present consultation proposes to take views on the use of metrics — for the most part meaning citation counts — to prospectively incorporate these into mechanisms of research assessment once more.
We also want to note a contradiction in different reasoning for using metrics. On the other hand, the argument is that metrics do actually replicate the outcomes of peer review processes so approximate a cheaper and quicker way of doing the same thing.
There is an important tension here: The Review team need to make a clear determination on which of these objectives it is pursuing.
Using metrics for measuring impact: This is a core question to answer if we want to know what citation count metrics actually tell us, and what they can be used for. Possible answers to this question include: This has been one of the most controversial pieces in the discipline, and has probably been cited for all of the reasons above he initially published a short version in Foreign Affairs journal.
This no doubt has contributed to a political climate which has facilitated military interventions in the Middle East and more aggressive attitudes towards religious diversity from members of different religions.
On the other hand, much more detailed and nuanced work exists based on solid historical evidence and knowledge of contemporary relations, which will have many fewer citations due to publishing outlet, the profile of the author, and the less outrageous, if much more rigorous, findings.
These accumulated citations to Huntington clearly indicate that the texts have been central to networks of scholarly argument about world politics in recent decades, and we might learn much from that fact.
Metrics and the measurement of impact 8. Indeed, the overall pressure it creates is simply to get cited at all costs.
This might well lead to work becoming more provocative and outrageous for the sake of citation, rather than making more disciplined and rigorous contributions to knowledge.
Citations can tell us about academic citations — themselves a mixture of good and bad — but they can tell us very little about the public engagement and contribution made by particular pieces of work for non-academic communities in society. This is especially the case where academics are trying to work with small-scale and grassroots organisations rather than governments or international organisations.
Metrics and the measurement of research quality It should be further evident that because of what citation counts actually measure, these are not an appropriate proxy for research quality. These are broadly the same kind of criteria that expert peer reviewers apply when reviewing book manuscripts or journal articles.
Textbooks and edited collections are widely cited because they are accessible — not because they are original. Moreover, highly original work may not be cited at all because it has been published in a lower-profile venue, or because it radically differs from the intellectual trajectories of its sub-field.When considering a research idea, we are bound to rely on previous findings on the topic.
Work done in the field constructs the foundation for our research and determines its course and value. Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study.. The research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to integrate the different components of the study in a coherent and logical way, thereby, ensuring you will effectively address the research problem; it constitutes the blueprint for the collection, measurement, and analysis of data.
How to read and assess research articles. An abstract of an article is a summary of the paper and appears after the list of authors. If there is an introduction, it describes the background leading up to the research, and often mentions other similar studies.
If well written, the introduction will bring readers up to speed on the field and. Some of the methodologies used to assess journal quality include citation analysis, peer analysis, circulation R&D discussion Paper #6 INDICATORS OF JOURNAL QUALITY by Lucia Tome and Suzanne Lipu often used synonymously with research quality .
Evidence is the information that helps in the formation of a conclusion or judgment. Whether you know it or not, you provide evidence in most of your conversations – they’re all the things you say to try and support your claims. The goal of a research proposal is to present and justify the need to study a research problem and to present the practical ways in which the proposed study should be conducted.
The design elements and procedures for conducting the research are governed by standards within the predominant discipline.